Windows 11’s L3 cache is way worse than on Windows 10 Pro

L3 cache is one of the most important caches in modern computers. It is a big one, which may be a big reason why Windows 10 Pro’s L3 cache is way worse than Windows 10 Pro’s L3 cache. This isn’t the first time that Intel’s L3 cache has been compared to Windows 10 Pro’s L3 cache. But, this time, it is different because Windows 10 Pro’s L3 cache has been tested in some of the most impotent systems imaginable.

In some ways, Windows 10 is already a mature operating system. One of the operating system’s greatest strengths is its high-speed, low-latency network connection, which is present on all devices running the OS. It allows the operating system to react quickly to network events, so applications running on the OS can pull data faster than they can. And that’s what makes the Windows L3 cache such a great feature. Using the L3 cache, which is a part of the Windows kernel, applications can access RAM as fast as possible, resulting in less latency and better performance. Applications can also use the L2 cache, which is also available in the operating system, to access their RAM.

L3 cache, or L3 cache, is a special type of cache which is formed within your processor, and it stores a lot of data. In fact, it can hold a whopping 19 MB of data on the Kaby Lake-H processor. This makes it an extremely important part of the whole processing pipeline, since it works as a virtual RAM cache that can be used to store data that is being read from RAM.. Read more about how much cache memory is good and let us know what you think.

to Alexander Polobok.

Editor of the message

With an overwhelming desire to get to the bottom of things and get to the truth, Alex has spent much of his time as a reporter, presenter, on television and radio….. Read more

  • A benchmark test conducted by a user on 64-bit Windows 11 yielded some rather unexpected results.
  • The results show that the L3 cache undergoes a significant decrease compared to the same bit version of Windows 10 Pro.
  • The test was conducted using the AIDA64 application on a PC with an AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-core processor.
  • Some users have doubts about the accuracy of the test itself, as AIDA64 has given inaccurate measurements for the L3 cache in the past.

Needless to say, everyone is now diligently testing every version of Windows 11 that somehow made it to the Internet.

After discussing how Windows 11 works better on older devices than its predecessor and even offers smoother gameplay, users found some irregularities in the first version.

After running several benchmark tests of the new operating system, some results shocked users who tried the tests.

L3 cache severely affected in 64-bit Windows 11

Curiosity prompts many users to test this new version of Windows intensively, and so far the results are more than satisfactory.

A recent thread on Reddit has sparked controversy among users, with heated discussions about the overall performance of 64-bit Windows 11.

The author of this article has done some tests with AIDA64 on both the 64-bit version of Windows 10 Pro and the 64-bit version of Windows 11.

The results, which he was not at all happy with, indicate that the L3 cache is not really working as expected. Note that these tests were run on an AMD Ryzen 5 3600 processor with 6 cores.

As we’ve said before, it’s too early to engage in such pointless semantics, since the first versions of the OS are too limited and lack most basic features.

Not surprisingly, there are still elements that don’t work as expected. However, that doesn’t stop users from pushing this version to its limits and trying to figure out what’s wrong.

AIDA64 Defective or accurate reading?

While the above test results have discouraged some users, an important question remains.

Is this data as accurate as possible or is AIDA64 just having trouble reading the L3 cache?

Strange as it may seem, in the past this app has given inaccurate results for this particular cache, as some more knowledgeable users in this thread have noted.

Do you see real load differences (also in other benchmark results), or only in the AIDA L3 cache speed test? In the past, AIDA has had problems with the accuracy of the L3 cache test (albeit with Zen 3 processors), as well as with the memory bandwidth specification. It’s also possible that the under-the-hood changes in this version of Windows 11 only affect AIDA accuracy (changing the timer, etc.).

A very good point, as many factors can affect the results of this type of test.

Few other people have reported similar readings, which could mean that few people have done this test, or maybe the readings are just inaccurate.

The only way to be one hundred percent sure of Microsoft’s overall position on Windows 11 is to wait for the official presentation of the final product.

Any testing we do now will be more or less useless when the final, polished version of the operating system is available to users around the world.

Was this page helpful?

Thank you.

Not enough details.

It’s hard to understand


Contact an expert

Take part in the discussionThe L3 cache is an indirect core-like cache that Microsoft developed for Windows 10. It is a very efficient way to store small amounts of data (such as kernel data and per-process data). It is also a good option to migrate from Windows 8 to Windows 10, because it is more efficient than the L1 cache and the L2 cache. However, L3 cache performance is not the best option to use.. Read more about l3 cache bandwidth and let us know what you think.

how much cache memory is goodl3 cache sizel1, l2, l3 cache sizehow much cpu cache do i needl3 cache bandwidthl2 vs l3 cache,People also search for,Privacy settings,How Search works,how much cache memory is good,l3 cache size,l1, l2, l3 cache size,how much cpu cache do i need,l3 cache bandwidth,l2 vs l3 cache,what is the purpose of cache memory,what is l1, l2 l3 cache

You May Also Like